It's fantastic :  
Many responses to my problems.
Thank you very much.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 9:59 PM
Subject: Re: What kind of TIFF does FOP support


> Rodolphe VAGNER wrote:
> > In fact the first tests I've done seem to indicate the contrary :
> > my uncompressed file is a black area and my CCITT Gr4 or 3, and LWZ
> > compressed files
> > are well rendered.
> > It's bizarre, isn'it ?
> > What about jimy ? where can I find doc on it ?
> 
> Ok, here it goes.
> The Jimi home page is
>   http://java.sun.com/products/jimi/
> You can download the whole package there, including
> Source, JavaDoc and, most valuable, additional docs
> describing supported file and image formats.
> 
> For TIFF, the following compression schemes are supported
>    - Uncompressed images
>    - CCITT compressed Bi-level images with CCITT RLE, CCITT
>      Group 3 1D Fax, CCITT Group 3 2D Fax, CCITT Group 4 Fax
>    - CCITT Class F Fax
>    - Packbits compressed images (a simple RLE type compression)
>    - LZW Compressed images
> JPEG compression is not supported.
> 
> The TIFF spec is available from
>   http://partners.adobe.com/asn/developer/PDFS/TN/TIFF6.pdf
> Compression schemes are
>    Packbits: run length encoding (Sec. 9)
>    CCITT G3 Fax (Sec. 10)
>    CCITT Bilevel (Sec. 11)
>    LZW (Sec. 13)
>    JPEG (Sec. 22)
> CCITT Class F compression is apparently defined in a RFC,
> for example available here:
>   http://www.zvon.org/tmRFC/RFC2306/Output/chapter3.html
> 
> It is also mentioned that Jimi does only understand
> black and white (bilevel), grayscale (palette) and RGB
> (palette and direct color). CMYK, Cie L*a*b* and YCbCr
> color models are not implemented.
> 
> It is not mentioned whether compression predictors are
> supported, I supposed not (does anybody use them?). It is
> also not explicitely noted how Jimi deals with alpha
> channels.
> 
> If uncompressed TIFF comes out black, probably the color
> model or palette size is inconvenient for Jimi.
> 
> J.Pietschmann
> 

Reply via email to