In the same vein... I'm trying to put together a catalogue index, which is dependent on <fo:leader>. I'm also getting a ragged right-hand margin from 0.20.5rc2 (see to GET from http://coolbox.seseit.com/~rob/fop.0.20.5rc2.html), but when I used the last of yesterday's snapshot from the CVS repository (xml-fop_20030309052748.tar.gz) the output looks worse rather than better (sorry I've not got a link for this). I therefore wonder if I'm doing something stupid. My link has got my XML source and XSL... I was wondering if some kind soul could eye-ball the XSL to see if there is something I can do to improve matters, or if I should hang back and wait for fo:leader to be sorted out by the maestros?
-----Original Message----- From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 March 2003 22:02 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: fo:leader weird output (again) ;o) Clay Leeds wrote: > When you say "this bug is fixed in CVS" do you mean that it's fixed in > the "maintenance branch" (i.e., the soon-to-be-released 0.20.5/0.20.5rc3 > version) Yes. There is a CHANGES and an archive for the commit messages at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-cvs J.Pietschmann --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
