Thank you so much! I followed your recommendations and http://coolbox.seseit.com/~rob/fop.0.20.5rc2.using-index.3.html looks good to me with 0.20.5rc2
-----Original Message----- From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 March 2003 11:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: fo:leader weird output (again) ;o) Rob Staveley (Tom) wrote: > In the same vein... I'm trying to put together a catalogue index, which > is dependent on <fo:leader>. I'm also getting a ragged right-hand margin > from 0.20.5rc2 (see to GET from > http://coolbox.seseit.com/~rob/fop.0.20.5rc2.html), but when I used the > last of yesterday's snapshot from the CVS repository > (xml-fop_20030309052748.tar.gz) the output looks worse rather than > better (sorry I've not got a link for this). The problem is, the lines are correctly aligned during layout, in the PDF renderer the "(912)" strings have exactly the same x-position and area width. I can only guess something weird happens with the space calculation between the leader and the word on the line end. Also , the space at the block end is occasionally a problem. As a workaround: - Use leader-alignment="reference-area". This guarantees the leaders end at the same x-position if the followig word has the same length as on the line before. It also looks better. - Write your XSLT so that no extra space occurs at the end of the line, i.e. ...080)</fo:inline></fo:block> instead of ...080)</fo:inline> </fo:block> This looks already much better. J.Pietschmann --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
