Victor, Victor Mote wrote: > Sorry to be so slow responding. First, it took me a while to write the > content, then there is a time lag before it is published, then ... I forgot > I had flagged the message for followup. Anyway, please review the revised > graphics doc: > http://xml.apache.org/fop/graphics.html > and let me know if we missed anything. The only thing that I think is > missing is for all of the formats to be in the faq, which we have already > discussed.
This looks great (!) I only have a couple of ideas/suggestions: - To help with searching the FOP site, put the "title" of the image format in parentheses for all image formats (if known) like you've done with ICO, PICT & PSD--i.e., GIF (Graphics Interchange Format); PNG (Portable Network Graphics); etc. - at the bottom of the JPG and/or Graphics Resolution section(s), add a hint (FAQ?) about increasing the resolution of the JPG image to improve rendering. My JPG images looked pixelated until I changed it from 72dpi to 300dpi in Photoshop. - I don't know if you can automate this, but it would be nice to have the Batik version indicated. - You might also indicate "FOP uses the SVG library from the <a href="http://www.apache.org/";>Apache Foundation</a>'s <a href="http://xml.apache.org/batik/";>Batik</a> - it also might be nice to include why someone might want to use SVG instead of JPG, PNG or one of the other graphics formats (resolution independent, standard, vector-based, small size? dunno...) Did I mention this looks grrrrrreat!? -- Clay Leeds - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Developer - Medata, Inc. - http://www.medata.com PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/cleeds.asc --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
