Clay Leeds wrote:

> - To help with searching the FOP site, put the "title" of the image
> format in parentheses for all image formats (if known) like you've done
> with ICO, PICT & PSD--i.e., GIF (Graphics Interchange Format); PNG
> (Portable Network Graphics); etc.

OK. Done in CVS.

> - at the bottom of the JPG and/or Graphics Resolution section(s), add a
> hint (FAQ?) about increasing the resolution of the JPG image to improve
> rendering. My JPG images looked pixelated until I changed it from 72dpi
> to 300dpi in Photoshop.

OK, I have added (in CVS) a paragraph at the bottom of the Graphics
Resolution section that addresses this in general terms.

> - I don't know if you can automate this, but it would be nice to have
> the Batik version indicated.

OK, added (in CVS) in the Batik section (as opposed to the SVG section).

> - You might also indicate "FOP uses the SVG library from the <a
> href="http://www.apache.org/";>Apache Foundation</a>'s <a
> href="http://xml.apache.org/batik/";>Batik</a>

OK, I reworked this a bit (in CVS), adding the Apache name in the Batik
section, and adding a link to Batik from the SVG section.

> - it also might be nice to include why someone might want to use SVG
> instead of JPG, PNG or one of the other graphics formats (resolution
> independent, standard, vector-based, small size? dunno...)

I'm not going to do that one. The page needs to be informative, not
persuasive. I don't care what format they use, and there are much better
forums (fora?) for getting that information.

Thanks for all of the good input.

Victor Mote


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to