BTW enclosing text in fo:inline is just a waste of ressources, it doesn't change much with regard how the text is handled (except exposing a bunch of nasty bugs). In particular, it wont cause different handling of the whitespace which happens to be before or after the fo:inline, unlike xsl:text.
J.Pietschmann
I was unaware of the "waste of resources" issue. This might be useful information to add somewhere (Run Page? FAQ?), when users are trying to improve the performance of FOP.
I use fo:inline frequently in my XSL-FO templates to place a smaller "space" between label text inherited font-size="10pt":
<fo:block font-size="10pt"> First<fo:inline font-size="4pt"> </fo:inline>Name </fo:block>
Would it be more efficient (or more "proper") to use fo:leader instead? Are there other options that are more efficient or preferred for some reason?
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
