On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 11:36, James Earl wrote: > On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 11:32, Julian Reschke wrote: > > James Earl wrote: > > > ... > > > Well, at least now I understand why! Man, this is easy, who needs auto > > > table layout!!! > > > > Well. If it's that easy, I don't understand why FOP can't do this on > > it's own rather than requiring special workarounds... > > > > Julian > > I was just thinking the same thing! :) > > I'm sure there's some technical explanation that's way over my head. > > James
I think I may have spoken too soon. It isn't quite working as well as I would like on some of my larger result sets, with more columns. James --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
