|
keep-with-next, keep-with-previous do work for table
rows. That is part of the reason why I now have multi-layered tables in my
.fo files. It's a bit slow but it works. From: Raphael Parree (Triveratech) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 1:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: List problem No
particular reason for using list other than what I need is what a list offers
(in XSL-FO spec). I will consider refractoring it to a table, however tables
make my transformation slow. Does
someone know how this is resolved in a next version of FOP. Also will keep-with
next etc be supported? tx., Raphaël
Parrée Director
Courseware & Consulting Services
Principal
Consultant Direct
phone: +33
498
050075 Voice
mail
+33 683 468663 Trivera
Technologies Global
J2EE Education, Mentoring, Courseware & Consulting
Services
Trivera Technologies EMEAA
Trivera Technologies Europe, Middle East, Africa &
USA & Canada
Asia
Pacific
P
+33 442 163594
P 1 609 953
1515 F
+33 442 163509
F +1 609 953
6886 Espace
Cézanne
135 Meeshaway Trail 14,
Parc Golf du Club
Medford Lakes 13856
Aix-en-Provence (France)
NJ08055 (USA) URL
http://www.triveratech.com Disclaimer
.. "This
email transmission (including attachments, if any) is confidential and intended
solely for the person or organization to whom it is addressed and may contain
information that is privileged, proprietary or confidential and exempt from
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any
distribution, dissemination or copying of the information is strictly prohibited
including taking any action in reliance of it. Any views expressed in this
message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically
states them to be the views of any organization or employer. If you wish to
forward or otherwise use all of part of the content of this message, you need
sender's written permission prior to forwarding or using the content. If you
have received this message in error, do not open any attachment but please
notify the sender (above) deleting this message from your system. Please rely on
your own virus checking, no responsibility is taken by the sender for any damage
rising out of any bug or virus infection." -----Original
Message----- Any
particular reason you don't just make a table with 2 columns, the first column
being your fo:list-item-label body? It may get around certain limitations
in fop 0.20.5. A
few other comments on your tables from my recent dive into using them:
<fo:table
width="100%"> is not supported AFAICT in fop 0.20.5. I have to specify
exact width in inches/mm/etc to avoid getting a warning.
Your
<fo:table-column column-number="1"> (column-number attrib not supported in
fop), use <fo:table-column column-width="proportional-column-width(1)"/>
and provide column entries in left to right order. In
general, I've found that tables don't like to play nice with other enclosing
elements and now have heavily nested tables to preserve layouts on my
pages. It slows down processing but I get the layouts in my PDFs that I
want. From:
Raphael Parree (Triveratech) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi
I am
having a problem making a list. I am using the XSL below to create a
list.
<fo:list-item>
<fo:list-item-label>
<fo:block
end-indent="label-end()">-</fo:block>
</fo:list-item-label>
<fo:list-item-body
start-indent="body-start()">
<fo:block>
<fo:table width="100%"
table-layout="fixed">
<fo:table-column
column-number="1"/>
<fo:table-body>
<fo:table-row
keep-together="always">
<fo:table-cell>
<fo:block>
<xsl:apply-templates
select="FOO"/>
<xsl:apply-templates
select="BAR"/>
</fo:block>
</fo:table-cell>
</fo:table-row>
</fo:table-body>
</fo:table>
</fo:block>
</fo:list-item-body>
</fo:list-item> What
happens sometimes is that the “-“ w/out any body is on one page and the body is
on the next page without a “-“. Any
ideas? Tx., Raphael |
<<image001.gif>>
<<image002.gif>>
