|
I know the of the support in table rows…that’s why I have
many of them 2 ;-).. But does anyone know what the support will be on blocks
etc for keep-with next etc? Raphaël Parrée Director Courseware & Consulting Services
Principal Consultant Direct phone: +33
498 050075 Voice mail +33
683 468663 Trivera Technologies Global J2EE Education, Mentoring, Courseware & Consulting
Services
Trivera Technologies EMEAA Trivera
Technologies Europe,
Middle East, Africa & USA
& Canada
Asia Pacific P +33 442 163594 P 1 609 953 1515 F +33 442 163509 F +1 609 953 6886 Espace Cézanne 135
Meeshaway Trail 14, Parc Golf du Club Medford
Lakes 13856 Aix-en-Provence
(France) NJ08055
(USA) URL http://www.triveratech.com Disclaimer .. "This email transmission (including attachments, if any) is
confidential and intended solely for the person or organization to whom it is
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, proprietary or
confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient,
you are notified that any distribution, dissemination or copying of the
information is strictly prohibited including taking any action in reliance of
it. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of any
organization or employer. If you wish to forward or otherwise use all of part
of the content of this message, you need sender's written permission prior to
forwarding or using the content. If you have received this message in error, do
not open any attachment but please notify the sender (above) deleting this
message from your system. Please rely on your own virus checking, no
responsibility is taken by the sender for any damage rising out of any bug or
virus infection." -----Original Message----- keep-with-next, keep-with-previous do work for table
rows. That is part of the reason why I now have multi-layered tables in
my .fo files. It's a bit slow but it works. From:
Raphael Parree (Triveratech) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] No particular reason for using
list other than what I need is what a list offers (in XSL-FO spec). I will
consider refractoring it to a table, however tables make my transformation
slow. Does someone know how this is
resolved in a next version of FOP. Also will keep-with next etc be supported? tx., Raphaël Parrée Director Courseware & Consulting
Services Principal Consultant Direct phone: +33
498 050075 Voice mail +33
683 468663 Trivera Technologies Global J2EE Education, Mentoring, Courseware
& Consulting Services
Trivera Technologies EMEAA Trivera Technologies Europe, Middle East, Africa & USA & Canada
Asia
Pacific P +33 442 163594 P 1 609 953 1515 F +33 442 163509 F +1 609 953 6886 Espace Cézanne 135
Meeshaway Trail 14, Parc Golf du Club Medford
Lakes 13856
Aix-en-Provence (France) NJ08055
(USA) URL
http://www.triveratech.com Disclaimer .. "This email transmission (including
attachments, if any) is confidential and intended solely for the person or
organization to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is
privileged, proprietary or confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are notified that any distribution,
dissemination or copying of the information is strictly prohibited including
taking any action in reliance of it. Any views expressed in this message are
those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states
them to be the views of any organization or employer. If you wish to forward or
otherwise use all of part of the content of this message, you need sender's
written permission prior to forwarding or using the content. If you have
received this message in error, do not open any attachment but please notify
the sender (above) deleting this message from your system. Please rely on your
own virus checking, no responsibility is taken by the sender for any damage
rising out of any bug or virus infection." -----Original Message----- Any particular reason you don't just make a table with
2 columns, the first column being your fo:list-item-label body? It may
get around certain limitations in fop 0.20.5. A few other comments on your tables from my recent
dive into using them: <fo:table width="100%"> is not
supported AFAICT in fop 0.20.5. I have to specify exact width in
inches/mm/etc to avoid getting a warning. Your <fo:table-column
column-number="1"> (column-number attrib not supported in fop),
use <fo:table-column column-width="proportional-column-width(1)"/>
and provide column entries in left to right order. In general, I've found that tables don't like to play
nice with other enclosing elements and now have heavily nested tables to
preserve layouts on my pages. It slows down processing but I get the
layouts in my PDFs that I want. From:
Raphael Parree (Triveratech) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi I am having a problem making a
list. I am using the XSL below to create a list. <fo:list-item>
<fo:list-item-label>
<fo:block end-indent="label-end()">-</fo:block>
</fo:list-item-label>
<fo:list-item-body start-indent="body-start()">
<fo:block>
<fo:table width="100%" table-layout="fixed">
<fo:table-column column-number="1"/>
<fo:table-body>
<fo:table-row keep-together="always">
<fo:table-cell>
<fo:block>
<xsl:apply-templates select="FOO"/> <xsl:apply-templates
select="BAR"/>
</fo:block>
</fo:table-cell>
</fo:table-row>
</fo:table-body>
</fo:table>
</fo:block>
</fo:list-item-body>
</fo:list-item> What happens sometimes is that
the “-“ w/out any body is on one page and the body is on the next page without
a “-“. Any ideas? Tx., Raphael |
<<image001.gif>>
<<image002.gif>>
<<image003.gif>>
<<image004.gif>>
