I doubt that a FOP extension provides the right hooks into PS output to do tray control. IMO the only current options are to modify the PS renderer itself or post-processing the generated PostScript (which I have done myself and which is fast and not that difficult). When I wrote the PS renderer I paid attention that post-processing would be easy (using DSC comments).
My long term wish list contains PPD support for the PS renderer which will also include extension to XSL-FO that will allow you to control PS generation in a more detailed way. On 08.10.2004 15:43:09 Dave_S_White wrote: > Is a FOP extension a candidate for this? I just started looking into > exactly what they are and how they work but the general concet of making a > new tag outside the FO namespace seems like it could be a good fit for the > postscript commands. Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
