Hi Glen, Do you want to say, that people listed under http://xml.apache.org/fop/team.html (including yourself) are less professional then RenderX? I do not think so. Or maybe it was the usual complaint about open source & limited resources? I think, you'll agree, that lack of resources is also often the case in many professional companies, and does not necessary have something to do with open source.
FOP is popular. I believe, FOP is also good. I just want to find out, how good it is. My hope is, that either the FOP team or one of the numerous happy FOP users could provide me with a representative sample. Regards, Ilya > Indeed, RenderX is a very solid product run by a very > professional company. It would be hard to go wrong > with them. > > Glen > > --- Ilya Khandamirov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I need a representative exampe, of what is possible > > to do with FOP. For > > example, RenderX XEP comes with XML versions of XML, > > XSLT and XPath specs > > and a stylesheet to convert them to XSL-FO (say > > PDF). The generated PDFs > > look very impressive. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Lassen Sie Ihren Gedanken freien Lauf... z.B. per FreeSMS GMX bietet bis zu 100 FreeSMS/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
