LEVRERO, Guillaume wrote:
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the quick reply. I will raise the bug in bugzilla.
Also0 where do you see the FO being invalid ? Are you referring to the missing
<fo:table-cell colum-number="2"> ?
If so, I could not find anywhere in the XSL-FO 1.0 recommendation, that you
must specify every table-cell in a row, if column-number and fo:table-column
are defined. Could you point me to the part of the XSL-FO 1.0 recommendation
that specifies this.
You don't need to specify a table-cell for every column. The reason I
said your FO is invalid is because your first row attempts to place a
cell on column 4, but you have defined only 3 columns in the table. So
whilst you don't need a table-cell for every column, it is necessary to
have a column for every cell (this is true for table-layout="fixed"
which is the only layout supported by FOP)! I hope that isn't too cryptic!
The sample I send is producing the expected PDF in Fop-0.92 ?
Fop-0.92 and Fop-0.93 don't seems to see this FO the same way.
As I indicated in my previous post. There have been a couple of changes
to Table Layout between 0.92 and 0.93.
Fop-092 -> FO is valid
0.92 should have flagged this as an error too. You have placed a cell on
column 4 when only 3 columns are defined.
Fop-093 -> Should raise an FO validation error.
Which one is right ?
Thanks again for your help.
Chris
<snip/>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
