On Mar 2, 2007, at 08:45, USHAKOV, Sergey wrote:
Hi Sergey,
I have played a little bit more after your comments, and now I am
even more
confused.
1. Removing width="100%" does not help and brings in one more
problem: a new
message appears: "INFO: table-layout="fixed" and width="auto", but
auto-layout not supported => assuming width="100%"" :)) That is
close to
what I was starting with...
Oops. It seems my message was unclear: you shouldn't remove
width="100%" from the table itself, but only remove percentage-widths
from the table-cells (IF they appear there...)
Looking at the example you mailed to me off-list, it seems to be the
width="33%" specified on the fo:table-cells that's causing the
message to appear.
If possible, I'd try switching to a layout with explicit fo:table-
columns. This can be fairly simple:
<fo:table table-layout="fixed" width="100%">
<fo:table-column column-width="proportional-column-width(1)"
number-columns-repeated="3" />
<fo:table-body>
<fo:table-cell>
...
This will give you a table where each column is 1/3 of the whole
table-width, which seems to be what you are looking for.
2. Changing width="100%" to an absolute value width="180mm" does
not help
either (and the complaints are the same as for 100%), and this is
amazing...
FWIW: I'll see if I can commit a small patch containing some changes
I made locally. The big problem with tracing the origin of the error
message
"Cannot find LM to handle given FO for LengthBase"
is that no context info is displayed, so you don't really know which
FO is causing it (only that it is /a/ percentage on /a/ FO somewhere
in your document...)
Cheers,
Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
