On 20.03.2007 11:35:38 Diane wrote: > Jeremias Maerki <dev <at> jeremias-maerki.ch> writes: > > > > > > It depends on your settings. If 0.20.5 is run at default settings, I > > would expect the PDF to be just under 2MB. A short test of my own > > confirms that (one JPEG of 929'406 bytes results in a PDF of 930'622 bytes). > > Maybe not all your images are really JPEGs or maybe you configured an > > ASCII85 filter for JPEG images or FOP, for some reason, decodes your > > JPEG images which can make them bigger. Without seeing the resulting PDF > > I cannot say what has happened on your side. > > > > I'm running with a specific user config file with our clients proprietary > fonts in, but I've just tried running through a stripped down file with one > of > their images and one from my phone camera. The phone camera image produces a > PDF much closer in size. > The images are being produced by a third party from within Photoshop - would > this be where you would save in any ASCII filters?
It really depends exactly on your configuration file and the images. If you want you can send me those off-list and I'll check what the problem is. I can only explain the increase in file size if those Photoshop images are not real JPEG images or if somethin in the config file is set accordingly. Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
