--- Andreas L Delmelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In short, you need to drop the border-shorthand on > the table, and > replace it with border-after/before/start/end. Most > important are > border-before-width and border-after-width, that > need to specified as: > border-*-width.length="0.5pt" > border-*-width.conditionality="retain"
Thanks, these additional properties did the trick. > Hmm... that's very strange indeed. There's > /something/ different > between the two borders you describe, but I only see > it distinctly at > either very low or very high zoom. It seems like a > difference of a > pixel or something. I'd have to take a real close > look at this to say > what's going on. AFAICT, so this seems to be related > to the border- > rendering. > > Try applying what I mentioned above, and instead of > specifying > borders only on the start- or end-edges, specify > half the border on > both. I'm not sure what you mean about specifying half borders. For what it's worth, table-cells that specify a single border (colhdr1,2 and colhdr1,3 specify the start/left border, while colhdr2,1 specifies the after border) their borders are wider/bolder than the table-cells that specify 2 borders (colhdr2,2 and colhdr2,3 specify start and after borders). ____________________________________________________________________________________ 8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
