Thanks Jeremias. Appreciate you take the time to help out. > > Is that the (only) way to tell to Batik to do something user specific > when > > resolving relative URI's? > > This is the wrong place to ask this question.
I guess the question should have been "is there anyway I can tell fop to tell batik..." I understand FOP and Batik are separate projects, but as a FOP user who wants to embed svg in fo that should not matter....in a perfect world that is. > > > Is there (any other) a way I can have FOP and Batik use the same > URIResolver > > interface? > > Not at this time. Batik doesn't use URIResolver. You could put in an RFE > with Batik or try to add direct support for it in Batik's source code. > What if FOP would invoke whatever Batik mechanism available to offer its end user a URIResolver based approach driven through the FOP API. Assume I would spend a bit of time trying to implement that, would it stand a chance to get adopted? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
