Hi, Thanks for the insight. I will check this out.
Regards, Ryan On 7/4/07, Andreas L Delmelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 3, 2007, at 05:55, Ryan Adorable wrote: Hi Ryan and other interested parties > I think for now, I have to use 0.20.5. I'll see what I can do for > this feature in 0.93. If you're really serious about seeing what you can do, I've already been reading up on the workings of fo:retrieve-table-marker, and I have a vague feeling that it is actually quite doable with the current state of the trunk code: * Modeling a basic FObj corresponding to a fo:retrieve-table-marker is virtually no work, I think, as we already have the RetrieveMarker it can subclass. The retrieved Markers will be the same, so I see no reason anything should be overridden in this part (except for the properties... maybe better to use a common superclass for retrieve- marker and retrieve-table-marker?) * We would need two additional properties that aren't yet supported: retrieve-position-within-table and retrieve-boundary-within-table. Since they're both regular enums, this won't be the load of the work either... * As to layout, creating the mapping from FObj to LayoutManager is easy. At first glance, this seems analogous to the FObj, so we can re- use much of the code of RetrieveMarkerLM. Only thing I'm a bit worried about in terms of layout is that retrieve-table-marker basically means that a table-header or table- footer's height can vary with the marker retrieved. Exotic conditions maybe, but still... :/ Due to the direction in which I pushed this: follow-ups on fop-dev@, please. Cheers Andreas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
