I've done a quick test shows that this should work just fine in 0.93, but it also works fine for me in 0.92beta.
Maybe you've made a mistake somewhere. So again, please attach a (preferably small) FO file that demonstrates your problem. Jeremias Maerki On 19.11.2007 11:15:58 wliem wrote: > Thanks Jeremias, > > It happens that the basic-link points to page 1 in the next page-sequence > rather than the first page. > > Table of Content > Introduction .... 1 > Content ...........2 > > ####################### > Actual Content of Page 1 > abcdef > > Actual Content of Page 2 > ghijkl > > Another Content with Page number set to 1 > mnopqrs > ######################## > > It happens when I click Introduction, it links to 'mnopqrs' instead of > 'abcdef' even though the block id links to 'abcdef'. > I know that I have to follow on the version upgrade to find the best > solution. But do you have any idea which version has > started to accommodate this? > > Many thanks, > wliem > > > We have no idea what you hacked into your customized version. You'd > > better try to work with standard XSL-FO than to coerce FOP into doing > > what you expect. Maybe you should start by explaining the problem you'd > > like solved in the first place. It could be that you simply don't know > > about some funny little detail that would have solved your problem > > easily. Attach a (preferably small) FO file that demonstrates the > > problem. That's the easiest way to get us to look into a problem. > > Otherwise, you just get some not really helpful answers like mine here. > > :-) > > > > BTW, I've explained it once before last week: It's generally a bad/risky > > idea to hack some private functionality into FOP and not publish it. > > Mainstream FOP development goes on and you may lose your investment in > > your code because suddenly, you can't easily upgrade anymore. Please > > work with us and we'll find the best solution together. That way you can > > protect your investments. > > > > I know, sometimes way may not be as responsive as one might wish. But if > > that happens, just keep bugging us. An issue may simply have slipped > > through the cracks. > > > > And yes, please upgrade from 0.92beta. ;-) Especially, since we have > > full support for internal destinations now. > > > > Jeremias Maerki > > > > > > > > On 19.11.2007 04:35:32 william wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> We're currently using 0.92beta. We have done some customization to the > >> fop version (in case you offer me to upgrade) > >> > >> The problem that I have currently is that: > >> For the purpose of the pdf output, I used initial-page-number = 1 to > >> reset the page number and start from 1 somewhere within the file. > >> As a result, some basic-link internal-destination does not point to the > >> right place even though the id has already been specified to the right > >> position. > >> > >> Suggestions are welcome. > >> > >> Thanks a lot, > >> wliem --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
