> FOP only evaluates background-position-horizontal if background-repeat > is "repeat-y" or "no-repeat", and background-position-vertical if > background-repeat is "repeat-x" or "no-repeat".
Honestly, this dependency on the 'background-repeat' is quite counter-intuitive for me, but once I about know this, it's no longer a problem. I tested my markup with background-repeat="no-repeat", and it works flawlessly, both with positive and negative values for 'background-position-*'. I am very glad and grateful that the development team is going into such great detail when interpreting the specifications. Some commercial implementations don't seem to care as much as you do. As for the project I am working now, your workaround is very straightforward, and it renders my document perfectly. And it has the added bonus that it will probably allow me to put the SVG markup inline, inside the 'fo:block' element --a feature that could become quite important for me in the future. Thank you very much for your help, Jeremias! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
