That's not the same problem. The increase is not ~105KB but almost 300KB. Something else must be wrong. If it were about the color profile, it would be an increase of about 105KB. If you post the two PDFs (before and after) I can better tell what exactly could be going on.
On 05.12.2007 13:53:54 hammo wrote: > > Hello, > > I have the same problem migrating from fop 0.20 to 0.94 - a file generated > using fop 0.20 = 147K, whilst the same file generated using fop 0.94 = > 434K. Also, I'm using jdk1.5 > Because these pdf files are dowloaded from a web app, the increase in file > size will mean the powers that be deciding that we do not migrate to 0.94 at > all. > Any other suggestions/observations since the last posts?? > > Thanks, > Paul > > > > Laurent Balthasar wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > we were using fop 0.20 and decided to migrate to the latest fop 0.94. > > Everything were fine except some code that needed to be adjusted. > > After some tests, we discover that all generated pdf have a much bigger > > size. From 6k with fop 0.20 it is now 112k?! > > > > After some investigations it seems inside the pdf one object streamed is > > much bigger but I have no idea what kind of element it could be (font, > > color profile, ...) > > > > Anybody knows what could be the origin of the problems? Generated Pdf > > works fine but it's really a waste of space, especially when sending > > emails with pdf attached). > > > > Thanks for any help! > > > > Laurent > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Empty-pdf-more-than-100k--tf4842011.html#a14171022 > Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
