On Feb 14, 2008, at 22:21, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
<snip />
Note that the fo:retrieve-marker has to be contained in a fo:block,
otherwise it has no effect. Or at least, so I discovered just
now... Not sure if this is compliant, so we might have to look into
that.
Looking closer, this appears to be 100% correct: if the fo:marker has
text-children, those child-nodes would become immediate descendants
of the fo:static-content when the fo:retrieve-marker is resolved, and
that is not allowed. Either the fo:retrieve-marker has to have a
fo:block ancestor, or the text in the fo:marker should have one.
Just FYI
Cheers
Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
