Thank you Kamal and Andreas, I commend those that are working on the source code for the FOP project. I am sure its no easy task. I would love to take this on, but my knowledge of Java is limited at best. I've only been working with Java for a few months.
I might have a possible solution to table header markers, which I will try out today. If it works, I will post the work-a-round solution. As for Andreas comment "The element is already implemented in my local sandbox," - Thats great news. I look foward to it in an up comming release. Once again, Thank you for your help. Regards, Bones Andreas Delmelle-2 wrote: > > On Apr 3, 2008, at 22:45, Kamal Bhatt wrote: >> bonekrusher wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am hoping if someone can provide some guidance on fox:continued- >>> label in >>> FOP 0.94. Is this supported? If not what is the possible work >>> arounds? >>> >>> Thanks for the guidance. >>> >>> Bones >>> >>> >>> >> Answer, according to this page: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/ >> 0.94/extensions.html, is no. >> >> And based on the release notes, ditto 0.95a. > > ... and, might I add, in the future it will never be re-implemented > as it was in 0.20.5 > >> >> The general (pretty poor) work around is to use markers. See here: >> >> http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl/sect3/markers.html#d14055e100 > > What FOP really needs for this to work, is an implementation for XSL > 1.1's fo:table-retrieve-marker. You would put those in the fo:table- > header or fo:table-footer. The fo:markers would be placed as > described. Since the retrieve-boundary only extends to the containing > fo:table, the earlier mentioned issue of two tables ending up on the > same page is eliminated. > I've already been assessing what we'd need to do for that, so it will > get there eventually. The element is already implemented in my local- > sandbox, but I thought it would be pointless to commit without a > backing implementation in the layout code. > > If there are any volunteers to take this on, I'd be glad to give them > some pointers. As I see it, much of the marker-infrastructure we > currently have in place can be re-used/extended, so it's definitely > not something that needs to implemented from scratch. > > > Cheers > > Andreas > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/fox%3Acontinued-label-tp16468084p16491003.html Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
