On Apr 8, 2008, at 22:01, Andreas Delmelle wrote: Just noticed a small error, so slight correction:
I have received confirmation in an off-list discussion that one and the same document, rendered with FOP 0.94:
This should be 0.20.5, actually... There /are/ a few Bugzilla entries that confirm that the behavior of the IBM 1.4.2 JVM is equally bad for FOP 0.9x, though.
Cheers Andreas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
