Andreas, Thanks a lot for your information.
Anyway, going from 64M heap size for FOP-0.20.5 to 896M for the new FOP-0.94 redesign is a huge different. Hopefully the FOP development team can improve this memory usage in the coming release. Thanks, LN. Andreas Delmelle-2 wrote: > > On May 12, 2008, at 16:57, LN wrote: > > <snip /> >> >> All these fo:blocks are in the same page-sequence. > > That explains a lot. This is a known scalability issue. FOP has > problems with very large page-sequences, as it is currently based on > a total-fit approach for the entire page-sequence. If you divide the > content over, say, 16 page-sequences of +/-100 pages, you should > already notice a difference > Something else that helps is using strategically placed forced breaks > (break-before="page"). > > > HTH! > > Andreas > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FOP0.94-and-FOP0.95beta-use-more-memory-than-FOP0.20.5-tp17188811p17277959.html Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
