Opps i am actually using FOP 0.20.5, but looks like a lot of work to upgrade to 0.9
Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote: > > If you posted (or better gave links to) some JPEG files that are not > working in your case, we could look into it. At any rate, you can check > if FOP 0.95beta does it any better because that version has a new image > loading framework which should improve bitmap support quite a bit. > > On 29.05.2008 18:58:12 Surjit Singh wrote: >> I am using FOP version 0.94 and I am trying to print certain images and >> in some case JPEGs are failing. I can see from the release notes that >> FOP native support of JPEG does not include all variants, especially >> those containing unusual color lookup tables and color profiles, >> however is there anyway of providing support for a greater number of JPEG >> variants. Even if this included adding some additional library files. >> >> I know about the workaround of saving image in image editor but i would >> like a more complete fix. >> > > > > Jeremias Maerki > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Printing-JPEG-Problem-tp17541120p17554426.html Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
