No. The only option I see for you is that you generate PDF or PostScript and convert it to PCL using GhostScript if you cannot use PostScript in the first place. No chance that you can upgrade to a JDK 5 or 6? I can see that IBM provides that for AIX: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/aix/service.html
On 16.06.2008 15:32:11 David Gerdt wrote: > I ran the test again using the most recent build (ca142-20080515 (SR11)) with > the same results. : ( > > Is there a way to circumvent this by setting up fonts manually? > > >>> "Andreas Delmelle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 6/13/2008 12:12 PM >>> > >----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- > >Van: David Gerdt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Verzonden: vrijdag, juni 13, 2008 05:30 PM > > > >I made the change to fo:wrapper and the problem does persist. > > OK, thanks for checking! (Even if it doesn't solve your problem, the advice > is still valid: if possible, use fo:wrapper instead of fo:inline. Maybe we'd > better add that hint to the website... I'll look into that.) > > In the meantime, I've also been looking at the related code, and it indeed > looks JVM-related. IIC, then the issue applies to all Java2D-based renderers. > The most likely cause is that one (or more) of the Java AWT font-related > classes return(s) different values for the same method call(s) on AIX and > Windows. (PDF and PS would not exhibit this difference, since they don't rely > on Java AWT for the font-metrics; using standard Java-APIs has its benefits, > but clearly also its drawbacks...) > > Is the JVM that is used on AIX the most recent available build for version > 1.4.2 (if I read correctly, it's a build from 1.5-2 years ago)? If not, can > you try upgrading to the latest build, and see if that helps? > > > Andreas > > Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
