Nevertheless, if you can post the fo with gibberish it would be useful for profiling purposes... (if sensitive, send it directly to the dev team and not to the list).
There is always a lack of real world examples! And real world is always giving us surprises. ;) On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 1:40 PM, DavidJKelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hmm - I see now that although the environment variable I mentioned earlier > had been set, that variable was not placed on the fop command line. I have > corrected the problem and it now runs fine. My apologies for the > misdirection, and thank you for the hint. > > Regards, > David Kelly > > > > Are you actually giving FOP a little memory to play with? I mean a > little more than the 64MB allocated by default? FOP is still a bit > memory-intensive, but 100 pages (per page-sequence) should easily be > handled with less than 512MB. If you can, post a link to an FO file. > That would allow us to do some profiling to see why this happens (if my > very obvious tip above doesn't apply). > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Java-heap-overflow-error---unknown-reason-tp18929472p18962257.html > Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
