Jay Bryant wrote:
Hi, Lou,
I see now.
I think you've hit your best choice with the table-per-row notion.
It's not ideal, but it has the virtue of getting the job done.
I agree. The only other alternative solution offered by XSL-FO is
fo:inline-container. However, this isn't implemented by FOP so you
really need to use Tables to solve this requirement.
<snip/>
Chris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
