Hmm, that's almost the same environment. That rules out a buggy codec implementation. And FOP 0.95 behaves correctly as far as I've seen. Maybe your expectations are wrong: If you generate an image at say 72x72 pixels and set the resolution to 72 dpi, you get an image with an intrinsic size of exactly 1 inch. If you save it with 300dpi (but the image is still 72x72 pixels), the image's intrinsic size naturally gets smaller (you have more pixels per inch).
On 04.11.2008 13:53:20 Florent Georges wrote: > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > > A short test with your back.png shows no problems on my machine > > (WinXP, Sun JVM 1.6.0_03 and Sun JVM 1.4.2_16). > > Thanks for the response. I am on Win XP SP 2, Sun JVM 1.6.0_01. > > > It could be that on your machine, a ImageIO PNG codec is running > > that is not properly reporting the image resolution. > > How can I give you more info about that? > > Regards, > > -- > Florent Georges > http://www.fgeorges.org/ Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
