Hi Vincent, Vincent Hennebert <vhennebert <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > Hi Francesc, > > Do you have a doctype declaration in your svg file? > <!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.1//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11.dtd";> No. Mine starts with: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?> <!-- Created with Inkscape (http://www.inkscape.org/) --> <svg xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"; xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"; xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"; xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"; xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"; xmlns:sodipodi="http://sodipodi.sourceforge.net/DTD/sodipodi-0.dtd"; xmlns:inkscape="http://www.inkscape.org/namespaces/inkscape"; [clip] But I doubt that the problem would be there because, as I said before, these files works correctly with fop-0.95 in my old laptop running Debian 32-bit (now using openSUSE 64-bit). > > I’ve had problems in the past with svg files not having a doctype > declaration, thus not recognized as being svg by FOP. But I don’t > remember the details. > > You may want to post your FO file and the SVG file so that we can try by > ourselves (if they’re not too big). You can find the tarball at: http://pytables.org/temporal/test-fop.tar.gz Regards, Francesc --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
