On 09 Mar 2009, at 19:30, Hamacher, Eric wrote:
Hi
Java 1.5.0_16
FOP 0.94
XEP Version 4.14 build 20081212
Just looking for some ideas.
We’re trying to leave XEP for Apache FOP but it’s been a rough ride
for our FO documents. These documents run fine when generating PDFs
in XEP but results in damaged PDFs with many severe errors.
Unfortunately, I can’t share a FO document with you. The root
element of a typical FO looks like
<fo:root xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format";
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
xmlns:xdt="http://www.w3.org/2004/10/xpath-datatypes";
xmlns:fn="http://www.w3.org/2004/10/xpath-functions";
font-family="Arial"
font-size="8pt">
Could there be a problem with the version of FO being used?
Not really with the 'version'. You could try FOP 0.95, maybe, but I
don't think that's going to be much different.
There are a number of elements/constructs that FOP currently does not
implement and XEP does (like fo:inline-container and fo:bidi-override).
In other areas, FOP is more strictly compliant to the XSL-FO Rec (or
at least interprets it differently than XEP; thinking of indent-
inheritance and space-resolution).
Those factors could require a significant amount of changes to the
stylesheet that is producing the FO, in order to obtain the same
result as XEP.
Regards
Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
