Andreas, Thanks, for the quick and helpful response. That was the case -- the two elements hold text in different scripts, and the small space obviously does not exist the Japanese font.
Best, Maria Andreas Delmelle-2 wrote: > > On 15 Mar 2009, at 08:36, Maria2009 wrote: > > Hi > >> <snip /> >> BUT: In the text I get different design of the footnote numbers: >> >> - Those from the m-elements are numbered "#n" without the >> nonbreaking space >> (Achtelgeviert). >> - Those from the note-elements are numbered "n" with the nonbreaking >> space >> (Achtelgeviert) included as I expected. >> >> What is going wrong? > > It's difficult to tell without seeing the FO result, but I'm wondering > whether it may not be a case of a different font-family being used in > both cases. If you end up with a literal '#', this points to a glyph > not being found in the font. Can you check if both are rendered with a > different font-family? The footnote's font-family is inherited from > the block the citation appears in. Unless it is also overridden in the > attribute set 'font.superscript', it could mean that those citations > appearing in the 'm' nodes will get a different font than the ones > appearing in the 'itm' nodes. > > > HTH! > > Andreas > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Numbering-according-to-attribute-tp22520689p22521424.html Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
