Hi Adrian & Frank, please note that "%!PS-Adobe-3.0" does not refer to the PostScript language level but to the version of the DSC specification which is 3.0. The language level is given by the following DSC comment:
%%LanguageLevel: 2 So this is no bug. On 01.04.2009 11:11:30 Adrian Cumiskey wrote: > Hi Frank, > > I don't think you are missing anything, I think it may be a bug. Having > stepped through the code, "%!PS-Adobe-3.0" is always written as the > first line of the header regardless of the language level. Could you > please send us a bug report at > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fop and someone > will take a look at the problem. I'll try to find some time later this > week. > > Thanks, > > Adrian. > > Frank Niedermann wrote: > > Hi Adrian, > > > > thanks for the link. This is my fopConfiguration.xml file: > > <fop> > > <renderers> > > <renderer mime="application/postscript"> > > <auto-rotate-landscape>true</auto-rotate-landscape> > > <language-level>2</language-level> > > </renderer> > > </renderers> > > </fop> > > > > And this is how I load this configuration file: > > String fopConfiguration = "fopConfiguration.xml"; > > FopFactory fopFactory = FopFactory.newInstance(); > > fopFactory.setUserConfig(new File(fopConfiguration)); > > FOUserAgent foUserAgent = fopFactory.newFOUserAgent(); > > > > But it still creates version 3 PS-files (I checked the header). > > > > Am I missing something else? > > > > Thanks, > > Frank > > > > > > Adrian Cumiskey-2 wrote: > > > >> Hi Frank, > >> > >> Yes, you can do this with the language-level configuration option (see > >> http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.95/output.html#ps-configuration). > >> > >> Adrian. > >> > >> Frank Niedermann wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> we are using Apache FOP to create PS files which should be printed on a > >>> HP-Unix machine. > >>> > >>> Unfortunately this machine only supports version 2.0 PS files: > >>> %!PS-Adobe-2.0 > >>> > >>> Apache FOP creates version 3.0 PS files which are ignored by the HP-Unix > >>> print system. > >>> > >>> Is there a way to tell FOP to generate version 2.0 PS files? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Frank > >>> > >>> > >>> Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
