Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote:
>
>>> Fop 0.95 currently has got a serious memory leak, right?
>>Depends on how much (if at all) it hurts you, but yes, there was a fix
> after 0.95.
>
> It hurts me a lot, as fop doesn't seem to release approx. 400MB of memory
> after it finished transforming.
>
>>> xmlgraphics-commons-1.4svn.jar
>
>>SVN snapshot, yes, compiled from SVN Trunk:
>>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/commons/trunk
>
> What svn version of it?
>
>> retroweaver-2.0.6-patched.jar
>> retroweaver-rt-2.0.6-patched.jar
>>
>> Will there be a fixed version (e.g. 0.95b) available which fixes the
>> memory
>> leak?
>
> I don't think so.
>
>>> Is it planned to switch to Maven to resolve the dependency issue?
>
>>I would oppose such a proposal due to the very bad experiences I've had
with Maven in the past.
> I switched your 0.95 svn tagged version to m2 here using the pom.xml of
> the repo1 artifact and it simply works.
>
>>I suggest you ask on the Maven list how you can include project-local JAR
files in your project. I would hope Maven is as flexible as they claim it
is. ;-)
>
> I don't want to start a religous discussion here, but with Ant there is a
> big problem with jar lib versioning.
> If the jar library doesn't state it's version in the filename or the
> manifest, you are hosed.
> You see it currently with the jar's I mentioned above. Nobody (except
> you?) know of what version they are.
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Fop-0.95-Memory-Leak-fix--tp24620640p24627566.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
