On 07 Sep 2009, at 18:11, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
On 07 Sep 2009, at 12:22, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
This is an interesting interpretation. There is some discussion about
that on the following bug report:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46160
One could return the question, taking the point of view of the
children
elements of the rotated block-container: when should that content be
broken over to the next page? When its block-progression-dimension
exceeds the available space in block-progression-direction.
No. When it makes the block-container break to the next page, hence
when its inline-progression-dimension exceeds the block-progression-
dimension of the block-container.
Note that this should normally change with XSL-FO 2.0, where in the
initial requirements (wish-list), there has been explicit demand to
define such 'vertical' breaks.
Fact remains: the block-progression-direction of the flow does not
change at all due to the reference-orientation on the block-container.
Difficult to see why other implementations would provide a proprietary
extension for this, if it's catered for by the Rec anyway...
Regards,
Andreas Delmelle
mailto:andreas.delmelle.AT.telenet.be
jabber: [email protected]
skype: adlm0608
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
