Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi Chris,
<snip/>
This is due to a bug in the table stepping algorithm, whose complete
description is out of the scope of this list. The attached patch against
I certainly don't want a complete description, but what about a high
level one? Was it something to do with the padding after that Pascal
mentioned? Clearly keeps had an affect as Venkat mentioned also.
This is due to the conditional space-after in the second column. It must
be discarded if the table is broken there, and taken into account in all
other cases. The total height of the table is different whether that
space is discarded or not. The bug came from there.
If keep-together is set on the table or the second cell, then all that
mechanism is bypassed, hence the visually correct result.
Vincent - Thanks for explanation. It makes sense at least at a high level.
<snip/>
Chris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
