Hi, FOP 0.9x is very strict regarding the XSL-FO rec 1.1, while FOP 0.20.x was lax. So, you have to fight all validations issues to get a clean, strict XSL-FO. Typically, you have to rewrite a consistent part of your XSLT when upgrading from FOP0.20.x to FOP 0.9x.
In the case you reported, the error message indicates that in one table-row, you have more table-cells that available table-columns. You should trace your XSL-FO to find were this occur (probably a column spanning not taken into account), then correct your XSLT. Pascal GangadharAthi a écrit : > Can you please provide me with the solutions??? > > GangadharAthi wrote: > >> Hi Deepthi... >> >> This is gangadhar...I am also facing the same issue..we are upgrading to >> 95 from 0.20.5. things working fine with 20.5 are not working with fop >> 0.95. Can you please mail me the solution for some problems like >> table-body missing child elements, table-header missing child >> elements..and columns overflow the number of cells..? >> >> My email id: [email protected] or [email protected] >> >> Thanks...your help is highly appreciated.. >> >> k deepthi wrote: >> >>> Hi Team, >>> I am K.N.B.Deepthi from an MNC. We have a requirement for converting >>> XSL-FO to PDF. Currently we are using FOP 0.95. We are facing problem >>> with nested <fo:table>'s with current version. The exception that we are >>> getting is: >>> Caused by: org.apache.fop.fo.ValidationException: Error(73/15): >>> column-number or number of cells in the row overflows the number of >>> fo:table-column specified for the table. >>> >>> Sample code: >>> <fo:table> >>> <fo:table-column width="30mm"> >>> <fo:table-column width="30mm"> >>> <fo:table-row> >>> <fo:table-cell><fo:block></fo:block></fo:table-cell> >>> <fo:table-cell> >>> <fo:table> >>> .... >>> </fo:table> >>> </fo:table-cell> >>> </fo:table-row></fo:table> >>> ....... >>> </fo:table> >>> >>> Another problem we are facing is that we have a requirement of wrapping >>> text around images. I would like to know if It can be implemented by >>> <fo:float> with dynamically created .fo file from our application. And >>> also whether FOP 0.95 implements Float objects or not. Please help me in >>> this regard. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Deepthi. >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
