OK, Pascal, I see. Thanks for this explanation. In the meantime I'll take care of the shaping in the style sheet myself. That is, I will make a table of the shaped characters and use them instead of character stacking. I don't know if this will be a font specific solution. If not, I can put the table in this thread when I finish it so it can be reused.
regards, Ruud On 02/06/2010, Pascal Sancho <[email protected]> wrote: > According to [1]: > > uni0F620F90 is a mix of uni0F62 plus uni0F90, IOW: > RA plus SUBJOINED KA > > and the other uni0F6A0F90 is a mix of uni0F6A plus uni0F90, IOW: > FIXED-FORM RA plus SUBJOINED KA > > The latter shows no character shaping and should only be used for > transliteration or transcription. > Since current FOP doesn't implement character shaping, the only layout > you get is the one with no character shaping. > > I have not sufficient knowledge to determine if the initial text should > take Tibetan letters in a reduced range (0F00-0F6F) or not, delegating > to user-agent (= FOP) the character selection, depending on its place in > the word. But I think that a such mechanism should be implemented. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
