Hi Michael,

Trunk. Most interesting features are in trunk anyway. And yes, my application 
is in a production environment.

Regards,

Georg Datterl

------ Kontakt ------

Georg Datterl

Geneon media solutions gmbh
Gutenstetter Straße 8a
90449 Nürnberg

HRB Nürnberg: 17193
Geschäftsführer: Yong-Harry Steiert

Tel.: 0911/36 78 88 - 26
Fax: 0911/36 78 88 - 20

www.geneon.de

Weitere Mitglieder der Willmy MediaGroup:

IRS Integrated Realization Services GmbH:    www.irs-nbg.de
Willmy PrintMedia GmbH:                            www.willmy.de
Willmy Consult & Content GmbH:                 www.willmycc.de


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Michael Seeberger [mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. Juni 2010 15:00
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: Page-Break and keep-together.within-page

Hi Georg,

thank you for your  answer but setting  keep-together.within-page="5"
doesn't work for me.
It still overflows the page when the content is to large. Are you using
FOP 0.95 or FOP Trunk?

Regards,
Michael Seeberger

Am 30.06.2010 14:40, schrieb Georg Datterl:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Yes, keep-together.within-page="5" is the way to go. Although differences 
> between numbers are not yet implemented, numbers in general are weaker than 
> page-breaks, whereas "always" is stronger.
>
> Regards,
>
> Georg Datterl
>
> ------ Kontakt ------
>
> Georg Datterl
>
> Geneon media solutions gmbh
> Gutenstetter Straße 8a
> 90449 Nürnberg
>
> HRB Nürnberg: 17193
> Geschäftsführer: Yong-Harry Steiert
>
> Tel.: 0911/36 78 88 - 26
> Fax: 0911/36 78 88 - 20
>
> www.geneon.de
>
> Weitere Mitglieder der Willmy MediaGroup:
>
> IRS Integrated Realization Services GmbH:    www.irs-nbg.de
> Willmy PrintMedia GmbH:                            www.willmy.de
> Willmy Consult&  Content GmbH:                 www.willmycc.de
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Michael Seeberger [mailto:[email protected]]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. Juni 2010 14:18
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Page-Break and keep-together.within-page
>
> Hi there,
>
> i'm using Apache-Fop Version 0.95 and i'm having problems to get my
> report created the way i want it to.
> The problem lies in the behaviour of Apache-FOP and the
> "keep-together.within-page"-attribute.
>
> The report i want to create consists of several fo:block-Elements in
> which i use fo:table-elements to layout the report and
> the behaviour of Apache-FOP as i want it to be should be something like
> this:
>       Condition 1. if a fo:block fits completely on a page then it should
> stay there.
>       Condition 2. if a fo:block won't fit completely on a page then
> Apache-FOP should insert a page-break and print it on the next page (i
> implemented this by using keep-together.within-page="always" and it works).
>       Condition 3. if a fo:block is to large for a single page Apache-FOP
> should insert a page-break where necessary (won't work if condition 2 is
> implemented).
>
> But until now i've not been able to get Apache-FOP working this way
> because FOP seems to have a problem with the combination of condition 1
> and condition 2. When a fo:block won't fit on a page FOP inserts a
> page-break
> when using keep-together but if this fo:block is to large for a single
> page it won't insert another page-break where necessary but overflows
> the page.
>
> The Reason for this seems to be the attribute-value "always", as my
> Google-research tells me "always" means that when using this value an
> fo:xxx-Element stays together no matter what even when this leads to an
> overflow.
> I've also tried using keep-together.with-next or
> keep-together.with-previous but it didn't work either and using
> integer-values instead of always isn't supported by Apache-FOP 0.95 as
> far as i know.
>
> And heres my Question: Is there really no way to make Apache-FOP create
> the report the way i want it to?
>
> thx in advance
> Michael Seeberger
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to