Hi Stuart,
Even im facing the same issue as you have mentioned. I have upgraded to FOP 0.95 and the new form generated has some of the text moved to second page becos of bigger line space. I noticed your resolution of setting line-height-stretch property. So can you please let me know how you were able to set this property to the value 1.13? In my xsl, line-height is given in <fo:block> and when i try adding line-height-stretch property, it errors out. Thanks in advance, Skhay Stuart Turner wrote: > > Hi > > Thanks for your quick replies. Thought I'd let you know how I got on. I > was resigned to trying different options as suggested until I took another > look at the RTF2FO configuration files. The file options.xml contains > compatibility settings to tailor the fo output for the different fo to pdf > converters supported by RTF2FO. Don't know how I missed it the first time > around but the setting line-height-stretch was exactly what I was looking > for. I decreased this value for FOP, (from 1.23 to 1.13 in case anyone is > interested), and the fo output produced now has a correspondingly > decreased line-height value. Vertical spacing is now virtually the same as > 0.20.5. > > As Manuel says the differences with the centre justification are to do > with core changes to FOP and so our users are going to have to live with > them. I'm sure in some cases the line breaking will look better and in > others not so. Hard line breaks definitely provide some level of control > over this. > > Thanks for your help, > Stuart > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Upgrade-0.20.5-to-0.95%3A-line-spacing-increased--tp23944243p29178115.html Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
