Sorry, I was overlooking your stack trace. This problem might already be fixed with this revision: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=985700
You might want to try out FOP Trunk then. On 29.09.2010 10:37:37 Shyrtol wrote: > > That's my problem. It fails when creating the FopFactory instance. > > How do I specify configuration-options without creating a new instance of > FopFactory? > > > Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote: > > > > Check out > > http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/1.0/configuration.html#general-elements > > (the "cache-file" setting) > > > > This will enable you to specify where to place the font cache. Just > > disabling the font cache might have negative implications for > > performance. HTH > > > > On 29.09.2010 09:27:48 Shyrtol wrote: > >> > >> I've tested FOP for a while and I really like it so far, however > >> yesterday I > >> encountered a problem. > >> > >> I've created a Servlet which outputs a PDF that works perfectly on my > >> machine, but when I run it on my web-hoster's servers I get a: > >> java.security.AccessControlException: access denied > >> (java.io.FilePermission > >> /usr/local/tomcat/.fop/fop-fonts.cache read) > >> java.security.AccessControlContext.checkPermission(Unknown Source) > >> java.security.AccessController.checkPermission(Unknown Source) > >> java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPermission(Unknown Source) > >> java.lang.SecurityManager.checkRead(Unknown Source) > >> java.io.File.exists(Unknown Source) > >> org.apache.fop.fonts.FontCache.loadFrom(FontCache.java:142) > >> org.apache.fop.fonts.FontCache.load(FontCache.java:132) > >> org.apache.fop.fonts.FontManager.setUseCache(FontManager.java:121) > >> org.apache.fop.fonts.FontManager.<init>(FontManager.java:63) > >> org.apache.fop.apps.FopFactory$1.<init>(FopFactory.java:159) > >> org.apache.fop.apps.FopFactory.<init>(FopFactory.java:156) > >> org.apache.fop.apps.FopFactory.newInstance(FopFactory.java:177) > >> <....> > >> when running FopFactory.newInstance() > >> > >> Well, it seems FontCache i assuming I have read-permission in the > >> home-directory, which I have not on the server. > >> > >> I have two suggestions how to solve this problem, > >> 1. In FontCache.loadFrom(File cacheFile), > >> the "if (cacheFile.exists()) {"-statement could be moved to within the > >> try-block. > >> This will result in no cache read if one does not have read-permission in > >> the home-dir. > >> > >> 2. Add read-permission-check in method "public static File > >> getDefaultCacheFile(boolean forWriting)" and default back to temp-dir, as > >> with write-permission. > >> > >> I guess the best would be to do both, that way if one does not even have > >> read-permission in the temp-dir, no cache will be used/read. > >> > >> Also, since the exception is thrown when I create the FopFactory, I > >> cannot > >> change the font-cache. So I'm stuck. > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> http://old.nabble.com/Bug--Read-permission-of-FontCache-dir-file-is-assumed-tp29835851p29835851.html > >> Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > > > > > > > > Jeremias Maerki > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Bug--Read-permission-of-FontCache-dir-file-is-assumed-tp29835851p29836308.html > Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
