Hi,
Standards and implementations have no bearing one to the other.
A standard is just a document approved by a standard commitee. They are
proposed by some parties for approval. The fact that they are approved
only means that as a "document" the proposed standard passes the
barriers of admition of the related commitee.
It has no bearing whatsoever with the usefulness in practice or the
applicability of the standard.
Just to point an example, the Microsoft document standard, was approved,
and is so much a "mess" that i'm not even sure if their productivity
package complies with it.
So yes, standards are good, but... to a point. It depends on who
promoted them, how, and what is their use in practice.
Cheers,
Kindaian
p.s.- promote a standard just because it was aproved as such has no
pratical value by itself.
On 29/09/2010 10:07, Glenn Adams wrote:
ok, but PDF 1.4 supports all of these, and FOP 1.0 does also; you will
have to provide the necessary hyphenation support however, but layout
should present no problem;
regards,
glenn
2010/9/29 Daniel Sánchez González <dsanch...@gmail.com
<mailto:dsanch...@gmail.com>>
We need oficial European Union languages (maybe not all, but most
of them). They are: Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English,
Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Irish,
Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese,
Romanian, Slovak, Slovene, Spanish and Swedish.
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:19 AM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com
<mailto:gl...@skynav.com>> wrote:
probably more pdf readers support 1.4 than 1.7; also, PDF 1.7
does not have any particular features that 1.4 does not have
that relate to multiple language support;
which languages do you require support for?
regards,
glenn
2010/9/27 Daniel Sánchez González <dsanch...@gmail.com
<mailto:dsanch...@gmail.com>>
We need multi-language support. We want to create ISO
32000 because it is standar and we think that it can be
viewed in any browser. Is it correct?
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Peter Hancock
<peter.hanc...@gmail.com <mailto:peter.hanc...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
Hi Daniel,
PDF support in FOP is currently limited to 1.4 - see FOP
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/trunk/output.html#pdf
I am not sure if there are any community plans to
support later
version of the format in the near future. Are there
any specific
features that have been introduced in the later
versions that you
require in particular?
Peter
2010/9/26 Daniel Sánchez González <dsanch...@gmail.com
<mailto:dsanch...@gmail.com>>:
> Is it possible to create a 1.7 pdf version (ISO
32000) with apache fop?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Daniel Sánchez
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
<mailto:fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
<mailto:fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
