Hi,

That works pretty good using FOP 1.0. Performance is really good and there
are no concurrent problems any more.

Thank you very much.

Félix.


Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote:
> 
> Please consider upgrading to FOP 1.0. The latest release contains some
> concurrency fixes for certain issues but I can't tell if that would
> address your concrete problem.
> 
> On 26.10.2010 10:33:56 shucoshuco wrote:
>> 
>> Hi there,
>> 
>> I'm using FOP 0.95 in a batch application that generates over four
>> million
>> documents. We need it to be very fast so for each execution we open 15
>> threads to generate the documents. The preformance is really fantastic.
>> 
>> Even though we have found out the next problem. We use our own font types
>> and sometimes, in a little number of cases (our tests have found that
>> around
>> 1 document between 250), the document doesn't show our fonts. More
>> specific,
>> we print documents with a barcode and in some documents it shows de code
>> with letters instead the barcode.
>> 
>> We have already found this problem with 0.20.5 but in that case we could
>> fix
>> it using synchronized blocks to access to the Options object. Since in
>> newer
>> versiones the fonts are managed in another way (using the setUserConfig)
>> we
>> don't know how can I solve this problem.
>> 
>> Thanks so much.
>> 
>> Félix.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> View this message in context:
>> http://old.nabble.com/Concurrent-issue-with-fonts-in-FOP-0.95-tp30055790p30055790.html
>> Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
> 
> Jeremias Maerki
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Concurrent-issue-with-fonts-in-FOP-0.95-tp30055790p30108622.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to