I didn't mention that I'm developing on linux, in part because most
users are on Windows and Macs.  I did mention that I'm running fop-1.0
from code I downloaded about a year ago.  It's the official 1.0 release
I believe. Certainly not from svn.

I'm just using the generate IF to get the size of a particular
fop-table.  I use that value to dynamically size region-before or
region-after.  Because I'm not using the IF to generate a pdf, I don't
need to mimic.  And it's been a while but I'm pretty sure using mimic in
my case just blows up.  Again, because I don't want to go past IF
generation.

On 12/12/2011 10:08 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 13/12/11 13:00, Rob Sargent wrote:
>> Well thanks Craig.  That might be good news, indeed. Are you positive
>> the value of the param isn't defaulted when you're generating IF, not
>> pdf. They sure don't kick in for me, but I'm not using the "mimic"
>> stuff. Is that the crux of the issue?
> Yes, I'm absolutely certain the parameters are properly applied. If they
> were not then none of the images would get inserted into my PDFs as the
> main parameter given is used, among other things, as a prefix for image
> URIs.
>
> As for mimic: As per the documentation, you must tell the IF renderer to
> mimic a particular output format if you want the layout generated for
> the IF to be appropriate for feeding back into fop to generate the final
> format later. Otherwise, because different output formats have different
> fonts with different font metrics, you'll get funky spacing issues in
> your text. I guess it might be OK to go without if you don't intend to
> feed the IF back into fop at all, but I'd still want to know which
> format's metrics I was using.
>
> What's your environment? Which version of fop are you using? (You should
> always mention this sort of thing when asking any kind of question).
>
> --
> Craig Ringer

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to