Hi,
The right construction should be to insert a sub-level list within a
parent list-item:
<fo:list-block>
<fo:list-item>
<fo:list-item-label>...</fo:list-item-label>
<fo:list-item-body>
<fo:block>my level 1 item</fo:block>
<fo:list-block>
<fo:list-item>
<fo:list-item-label>...</fo:list-item-label>
<fo:list-item-body>
<fo:block>my level 2 item</fo:block>
</fo:list-item-body>
</fo:list-item>
</fo:list-block>
</fo:list-item-body>
</fo:list-item>
</fo:list-block>
That said, the XSL-FO design for *-indent can be confusing, so I prefer
render lists with a 2-columns table, that avoid to use
fo:block-container in fo:list-item-body (*-indent reset).
Le 13/02/2012 16:50, Rob Sargent a écrit :
> We generate a lot of bullet-list text, to a depth of up to four levels
> of bullet. I'm wondering which is the better practice: to have a single
> list with all bullets or to have a separate list for each sub-bullet list.
>
> One advantage with the latter is that one can use keep-with-next to
> ensure that the first sub-bullet is shown with it's parent, but this is
> not (yet) a requirement and indeed might get ugly with a sequence of
> four bullets immediately descending to the max level.
>
> Any other pros and cons to these approaches would be very much appreciated.
--
Pascal
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
