ok, thanks, just wanted to check, as 0.001pt is exactly 1 millipoint which
is a bit of magic number in FOP, as it uses an integer representation of
millipoints in many computations, including the epsilon in the bug I
referred to below

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Rob Sargent <rsarg...@xmission.com> wrote:

>  If I'm following along correctly, I don't think my issue is one of
> rounding, rather one of actual layout /style/.  I run into trouble when the
> "next page" isn't of the same region-body definition AND has no room for
> text.  So far, with my conditional region-body definition I'm able to
> bypass the issue Pascal would have me report.
>
> Standing by,
>
> rjs
>
>
> On 06/04/2012 03:13 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>
> before filing a new bug, please review
>
>  https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51043
>
>  to see if the patch to that bug introduced the problem you are seeing
>
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Rob Sargent <rsarg...@xmission.com> wrote:
>
>> I ran your fo with and without the "+ 0.001pt" and indeed it fails and
>> works as you said it would.
>>
>> Good news, however.  Following up on your to arrange it such that the
>> "computed i-p-d for the content equals the one of the next page", I am now
>> creating region-body definitions for the gallery page conditional on the
>> preceding page layout (three-side or not).  This seems to be working very
>> well so far.
>>
>> Would you still like me to submit the bug report.  I don't feel the
>> thread title here would be appropriate. Perhaps "Insufficient space for
>> line break causes error on zero-length region-body" would be closer to the
>> truth.
>>
>> Thanks a ton for the work-around!  Saved the day, to be sure.
>>
>> rjs
>>
>>
>>
>> On 06/04/2012 02:05 AM, Pascal Sancho wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have focused on the 1st issue I found. May be there are other issues
>>> behind.
>>>
>>> Le 01/06/2012 18:13, Rob Sargent a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Thanks Pascal,
>>>>
>>>> Sort of glad to know it's not just me! Unfortunately I don't think you
>>>> example minimal fo actually recreates my problem. I'm trying to get the
>>>> "gallery" page to have NO text at all, whereas you working example has
>>>> two line of text on the "gallery" page. The best I have attained is a
>>>> single line of text on my gallery page by dialing in the margin-top to
>>>> 10.82in (10.83in generates the same exception, using 10.5 pt
>>>> TimesNewRomanPSMT).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hmm?
>>> With the XSL-FO attached to my previous email FOP throws a FOPException,
>>> and produces no output.
>>> I've set both font-size and line-height to 1in (on fo:root), and the
>>> available b-p-d of the 1st page body is less than 2in (page-height="11in" -
>>> body/@margin-top="9in + 0.001pt"), so there is no place for line break. Can
>>> you check again that you tried that example?
>>>
>>>  I should mention that in our production situation the textless gallery
>>>> pages work just fine, except when preceded by our "three-side" layout.
>>>> We have two symptoms: aside from the FOPException reported, in some
>>>> cases a single line of text appears on the gallery page. Since, as I've
>>>> said, I believe these two cases are related I have not generate the
>>>> 'single line of text' example. That has it's own interesting story which
>>>> I will refrain from telling at this time, except to confess the actual
>>>> page-layout dimensions for the gallery pages:
>>>>
>>>> <fo:simple-page-master page-width="8.5in" page-height="11in"
>>>> master-name="gallery6-page-3" margin="0.0in 0.0in 0.6in 0.833in">
>>>> <fo:region-body margin-top="10.0in" margin-right="0.70in"
>>>> margin-bottom="0.40in" column-gap="0.40in" column-count="2" />
>>>> <fo:region-before precedence="true" extent="9.0in"
>>>> region-name="header-gallery6-page-3" />
>>>> </fo:simple-page-master>
>>>>
>>>
>>> for the body of gallery6-page-3:
>>> b-p-d is 11in - 0 - 0.6in - 10in - 0.4in = 0,
>>> so, in case of multi-line content, there is no room for line-break, that
>>> cause a FOP exception if i-p-d changes on next page (this is a FOP bug).
>>>
>>> for each column:
>>> i-p-d = (8.5in - 0 - 0.833in - -0.7in - 0.4in) / 2 = 3.2865in
>>>
>>> If you leave a 0 b-p-d to force an empty page, you should ensure that
>>> computed i-p-d for the content (here each column) equals the one of the
>>> next page, the issue you are facing should not occur.
>>>
>>>  <fo:simple-page-master page-width="8.5in" page-height="11in"
>>>> master-name="three-side-page-11" margin="0.0in 0.0in 0.6in 0.833in">
>>>> <fo:region-body margin-top="0.75in" margin-right="4.3585in"
>>>> column-count="1" />
>>>> <fo:region-before region-name="default-right-header" precedence="true"
>>>> extent="0.50in" />
>>>> <fo:region-end extent="3.465in" region-name="three-side-start-11" />
>>>> </fo:simple-page-master>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please advise as to how to procede. Happy to register the failure you've
>>>> isolated (though I don't understand why the "fail" case doesn't generate
>>>> one-line of text on the first page?).Should I enter another on the
>>>> negative interplay of the two page layouts?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 06/01/2012 03:15 AM, Pascal Sancho wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Rob,
>>>>>
>>>>> sure you are facing a bug:
>>>>> when there is no room on 1 page to insert a line-break, then, if IPD
>>>>> change on next page, the described FOPException is thrown.
>>>>>
>>>>> See the attached minimal XSL-FO: when you remove the expression
>>>>> " + 0.001pt" from the margin-top value, it works like charm.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you please fill in a bug on FOP bug list, attaching this minimal
>>>>> XSL-FO?
>>>>>
>>>>> As a workaround, you should decrease the margin-top of your
>>>>> simple-page-master "gallery6-page-3" (leaving room for 2 * line-height,
>>>>> and/or add a break-before on the %block% that come in 1st place of
>>>>> your page 4.
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 01/06/2012 04:00, Rob Sargent a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> We're using FOP-1.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Admittedly it may be a stretch to call these "simple" page layouts but
>>>>>> the attached FOs show that the ordering of the page layouts can cause
>>>>>> the generation of the pdf to fail. The fo-fails.xml exists with
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Don't know how
>>>>>> to restart at positionNonLeafPos:927(Flow@61f93f69[@id=]],
>>>>>> NonLeafPos:399(BlockContainer@52ab9d99[@id=group-Normal Development
>>>>>> and Anatomy of the Cerebral Commissures]],
>>>>>> NonLeafPos:106(BlockContainer@e09d7b9[@id=]],
>>>>>> NonLeafPos:7(Block@58a2b90b[@id=]], LeafPos:-1(pos=29,
>>>>>> lm=Block@58a2b90b[@id=]])))))
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.AbstractBreaker.doLayout(AbstractBreaker.java:377)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.PageBreaker.doLayout(PageBreaker.java:85)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.PageSequenceLayoutManager.activateLayout(PageSequenceLayoutManager.java:107)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.fop.area.AreaTreeHandler.endPageSequence(AreaTreeHandler.java:238)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.fop.fo.pagination.PageSequence.endOfNode(PageSequence.java:120)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.apache.fop.fo.FOTreeBuilder$MainFOHandler.endElement(FOTreeBuilder.java:349)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> at org.apache.fop.fo.FOTreeBuilder.endElement(FOTreeBuilder.java:177)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.serializer.ToXMLSAXHandler.endElement(ToXMLSAXHandler.java:261)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> at org.jdom.output.SAXOutputter.endElement(SAXOutputter.java:1046)
>>>>>> at org.jdom.output.SAXOutputter.element(SAXOutputter.java:903)
>>>>>> at org.jdom.output.SAXOutputter.elementContent(SAXOutputter.java:1093)
>>>>>> at org.jdom.output.SAXOutputter.elementContent(SAXOutputter.java:1067)
>>>>>> at org.jdom.output.SAXOutputter.element(SAXOutputter.java:897)
>>>>>> at org.jdom.output.SAXOutputter.output(SAXOutputter.java:621)
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> org.jdom.transform.JDOMSource$DocumentReader.parse(JDOMSource.java:476)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transformIdentity(TransformerImpl.java:636)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerImpl.transform(TransformerImpl.java:707)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ... 7 more
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some explaintion of the intent: The "three-side-page-*" s-m-ps usurp a
>>>>>> two-column text xsl-region body placing a static region over one of
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> columns and the gallery6-page-* attempt to set the size of the
>>>>>> region-body to zero (creating a 'text-less' page).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note that the gallery6-page-* layout was recently reworked to be
>>>>>> textless. Prior to that (developed originally in FOP-0.95) we had an
>>>>>> inch of text available and detected no order dependency amongst the
>>>>>> orderings of layouts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And yes the s-m-ps are generated on the fly by the xsl translation,
>>>>>> whereby a static page definitions is loaded into a page-number
>>>>>> specific
>>>>>> master, also left/right adjusted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Furthermore, in other we also experience a single line of text on the
>>>>>> gallery6-page-*s only when preceded by a three-side-page-* s-m-p. If
>>>>>> necessary I will report that as a separate issue, but at this point
>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>> hoping both symptoms are tightly related.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any work-around much appreciated. If requested, I'm more than willing
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> report this as a bug. Unfortunately we cannot wait for FOP-1.1 but we
>>>>>> could run off the trunk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As I see it the diffs in the two attached FO's are entirely in the
>>>>>> static-regions as one would expect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We're at crunch time and could go back to the original definition of
>>>>>> gallery6-page* but would /really/ rather not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>   ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to