I think this makes sense, I don't, however, know how hard it is to implement going backwards. Also, since we've just voted and released the 1.1 version, I don't think this warrants a 1.1.1 release so it might be a while before this fix is implemented in a released JAR.
But it's definitely a good suggestion going forward, in my opinion. Let's see what the others think. Thanks Mehdi On 24 October 2012 17:28, Philip Olson <phi...@roshambo.org> wrote: > Hello, > > While testing multiple FOP versions, sometimes I confuse myself > and forget my current version. I nearly always checkout from SVN > and "fop -version" always returns "FOP Version svn-trunk" but I > request that it also include the branch version number. So either > 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, etc. Thoughts? > > Regards, > Philip > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > >
