Hi Jason, The backwards incompatibility of this API has been discussed quite a lot, and I'm sorry you're having these issues. If you're looking for examples for how to configure the new FopFactory, I'd say look in the source [1], there are plenty of examples on how to do it, there's also quite a bit of information on the wiki [2].
Sorry for the inconvenience, Mehdi [1] http://svn.eu.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/examples/embedding/java/embedding/ [2] http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/FopFactoryConfiguration On 8 November 2012 01:54, Jason Harrop <jhar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I maintain the docx4j project > > I reported https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54094 which > was apparently fixed in July, but didn't make it into FOP 1.1 (just > released). > > So, I thought I'd test a FOP nightly (20121107) to verify it has been > fixed. > > But config seems to have changed extensively post 1.1 > > Post 1.1, I can see FopFactoryBuilder, mentioned at > http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/FopFactoryConfiguration which > contains > > public FopFactoryBuilder setConfiguration(Configuration cfg) { > fopFactoryConfigBuilder.setConfiguration(cfg); > return this; > } > > but that class didn't make it into 1.1 (it has FopFactoryConfigurator) > > So, Is it feasible/sensible to try to be interchangeable between FOP 1.1 > and whatever is to come? Has someone written code which facilitates this? > > Please excuse if there are posts on this topic already. > > thanks .. Jason > > >
