I have been using FOP 1.0, but never mind, I have just fallin in love with wkhtmltopdf - the static version produces links inside the PDF file and the result is so much better than FOP.
Thanks, but I wont be using FOP any longer I think the result from wkhtmltopdf is much better, even with the problems with Arabic fonts. 2012/11/9, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>: > don't give up so easily; send me your input FO file (or a sample) and I'll > check what you are doing wrong... just to make sure, you are using fop 1.1 > yes? > > note that others are regularly using fop 1.1 successfully for arabic, so it > is probably a usage or config problem on your end > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Brian Hansen > <greencopperm...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Thank you all for your replies. >> >> I haven't been succesfull in getting the result right. I downloaded >> the attached files and tried those, and arabic was displayed using >> Arial, I also tried different other fonts such as ScheherazadeRegOT, >> but in all cases the letters are not connected correctly, each letter >> is displayed standing alone. Also vocal signs are lost even with >> ScheherazadeRegOT. >> >> Anyway, I found this application: https://code.google.com/p/wkhtmltopdf/ >> >> It uses webkit to convert from HTML to PDF and the result is great >> with regard to fonts. No FO file is needed. Links within the PDF file >> doesn't work, but I think I can live with that. >> >> I think I'm gonna give up on FOP for now and use webkit HTML to PDF >> instead. >> >> Best regards. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
