Hi,

the 2nd image has following features:
dot size: 919x600 pixels
resolution: 44417x44417 DPI
true size: 0.0207x0.0135 IN²

and the content-height of the 2nd external-graphic is set to 100%,

witch means: 100% of the height of container,
the latter defaulting to 100% of the height of the content (witch is
0.0135in)

So, result is as expected.

You should fix it in one of the following ways:
 - fix the image resolution (44417 is not a useful value);
 - or remove content-height property,
 - or specify an absolute value for the height.


2013/5/13 Roland Neilands <rneila...@pulsemining.com.au>

> Bob,****
>
> ** **
>
> IIRC, you are putting a 900px file into a 25pt area. FOP should shrink it
> to fit, but I suspect it still has issues doing this with large jpgs. Other
> image types (gif etc) work better.****
>
> ** **
>
> Cheers,****
>
> Roland****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* bob swanson [mailto:bobswans...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, 13 May 2013 12:51 PM
> *To:* fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> *Subject:* One JPG Displays, the Other Does Not****
>
> ** **
>
> I noticed this problem with a much larger document****
>
> I'm producing. I was able to trim down****
>
> to a small .fo file and two JPG images.****
>
> ** **
>
> I can display the JPG images with many software****
>
> products, so I know they are valid. However, the****
>
> PDF file created by my short script (using****
>
> the "fop" script on a Mac OSX system),****
>
> displays only one of the images. The****
>
> other is missing. I've tried viewing the****
>
> created PDF file with Adobe Reader, and****
>
> "Preview" from the Mac. In both cases, the****
>
> second image does not appear.****
>
> ** **
>
> What am I doing wrong?****
>
> ** **
>
> The .fo source, the two JPG files, and****
>
> a simple execution script for the "fop"****
>
> shell script are in:****
>
> ** **
>
> http://swansongrp.com/misc/problem.zip****
>
> ** **
>
> (you can ignore the link reference errors, but****
>
> there are no errors from reading the JPG****
>
> files)****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks for your help.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Bob Swanson****
>



-- 
pascal

Reply via email to